SME
Utorok, 26. január, 2021 | Meniny má TamaraKrížovkyKrížovky

Načítavam moment...
Momentálne nie ste prihlásený

Russell Crowe má Oscara. Ale nemá občianstvo (Späť na článok)

Pridajte priamu reakciu k článku

1 2 >

Hodnoť

na kazdeho rovnaky meter

Pekne napisane a zaroven je to aj ukazka toho ako to v slusnej spolocnosti funguje ( co sa o Slovensku neda ani zdaleka povedat). Ja som tiez musel splnit podmienky aby som Australske obcianstvo dostal a musi to urobit aj Russell, darmo ze je to hviezda.
 

.

tak tak, u nas by bol obcanom a kazdy by sa mu strkal do prdele, lebo je filmova hviedza...
Inak gratulujem a prajem vsetko naj, akurat sa rozhodujem, ci nevycestujem (natrvalo) mimo SR - pracu nemam zlu, ale zit kusok dalej a bolo by to lepsie :)
 

Sa tu pekne tlapkate po pleci, ale

Tu nejde o rovnaky meter, ktory vam ma davat hrejivy pocit rovnosti. Obcianstvo sa udeluje aj za prinos v nejakej oblasti, resp. ako clovek propaguje krajinu v zahranici a teda Crowe je vnimany ako australcan a myslim, ze su nanho aj oni hrdi, takze toto je taka byrokraticka buzeracia. Hlavne, ze si tam napustaju desattisice individui, ktore s ich kulturou zivota nemaju vobec nic spolocne (viete koho vsetkeho myslim) a robia im tam bordel...
 

nie sme v rusku

Nie sme v Rusku kde sa obcianstva rozdavaju.Ako tak citam tak ten velebny pan Crow o obcianstvo ani nikdy nepoziadal vid.
http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyl...

Australia je multikultrana krajina a vsade sa naju dobry aj zly tak isto ako aj na SK alebo hoci kde inde.
 

 

slusne to nie je.. nakolko tazia z jeho uspechov, citujem .. "zaradili ma do rebríčka päťdesiatich národných pokladov, som aj na austrálskych poštových známkach.."


a je to istym sposobom diskriminacne, kedze tam nemohol byt kvoli praci:

"Úrady mu občianstvo zamietli už dvakrát, v roku 2006 aj v roku 2013. Odvolávali sa vraj pritom na novelizáciu imigračného zákona z roku 2001."

"na občianstvo nemáte nárok, ak ste sa v nej v rokoch 2000 až 2002 nezdržovali potrebný počet mesiacov. A ja som práve vtedy veľa nakrúcal v Amerike,“ vysvetľuje."


navyse si ani poriadne nevedu zaznamy:

"Austrálske úrady na jeho sťažnosť reagovali tvrdením, že o jeho žiadosti o zisk občianstva nemajú žiadne záznamy."
 

Aspon netaraj

Najprv musis vediet o com pises .....
Ak ziadas o obcianstvo normalnou cestou tak sa rataju posledne posledne 4 roky od podania ziadosti cize ked ziadal v 2006 tak 2000-2002 as nepocita ale 2002-2006.
Ak ale poziadal a odvolava as na rok 2000-2002 tak potom ziadal na zaklade SCV vynimky pre NZ zijucich v AU na co nesplnal podmienky.
Na druhej strane tak slavny clover ako Russell by dostal vynimku nakolko ju minister moze udelit podla bodu 6.
Urcite vermin viac DIAC a ked vravia ze ziadnu ziadost nepodal tak to bude doveryhodnejsie ako to co trieska Russell.
 

 

add 1)" v tejto krajine žije od roku 1968. Vtedy mal štyri roky a rodičia sa s ním presťahovali z Nového Zélandu."

takze to ze 2000 - 2002 sa nerata.. by nemalo mat vplyv.
myslim si, ze ma narok na vynimku nakolko krajina profituje z jeho uspechov..

ci veris Russelovi alebo uradom je Tvoja vec.. Ja nemam dovod neverit Russelovi..
 

Zase taras

Precitaj moj posledny komentar a dozvies as ako dlho Russell zije v AU lebo v tom mas zjavne hokej. Vyberas lent to co as ti hodi.neviem ked zijes ale asi v AU nie bo potom by si vedel ze Russell rad tara.
 

 

nezijem v AU.. vychadzal som cisto z informacii v clanku a pisal som nazor na zaklade toho.
z clanku sa vsetko vydedukovat neda..

pozrel som si Tvoje komentare.. ok mas o teme zrejme viac informacii..

este skus ubrat z tej arogancie.. Tvojej pozornosti tiez uslo, ze od roku 2013 maju Department of Immigration and Border Protection (DIBP) a nepisem Ti zakazdym, ze taras..
 

 

Ja by som radsej veril DIBP ako DIAC;)
 

 

Ano DIBP Je novy nazov na ktory sa premenovalo emigracne z DIAC asi cca 2 roky dozadu.ja som Si za tie roky zauzival DIAC.....
 

 

Ak Ma pamat neklame tak sme to dakedy volali aj DIMIA.....cize za poslednych 15 rokov zmenili nazov aspon 3x.......
 
Hodnoť

 

*** (príspevok porušil KÓDEX diskutujúceho)
 
Hodnoť

chmuľo

šak nech si podá žiadosť!
 

ako ?

To sam sebe pises ? Sak si tu zdokumentoval, ze nevies ani citat.
 
Hodnoť

opajcli ste článočk, Kristínka?

pekne ..
 
Hodnoť

Nuž, ak by bol Crowe

neprispôsobivý Pakistanec, mlátiaci ženu ako žito a vyhlasujúci, že preňho neexistuje iný právny systém, iba šaríja, prinesú mu austrálsky pas až domov na podnose...
 

 

netrep
 

 

bohuzial ma pravdu:

Man Haron Monis (19 May 1964 – 16 December 2014) was an Iranian-born Australian citizen[2] who took hostages in a siege at the Lindt Chocolate Café at Martin Place, Sydney on 15 December 2014,[3] lasting for 17 hours, until the early hours of the following morning. The siege resulted in the death of Monis and two hostages.

According to London-based Persian TV channel Manoto 1, he had fled Iran after taking US$200,000 of his customers' money in his tourism agency.[21] The chief of the Iranian police, Esmaeil Ahmadi-Moghaddam, stated that Monis previously ran a travel agency in Iran and fled the country to Malaysia and then Australia, having "a dark and long history of violent crime and fraud".[22]

According to Iran's official news agency, he was under prosecution by INTERPOL and Iranian police at the time he was granted asylum, and Australian police did not extradite him despite several requests.[23] Some commentators have expressed concern regarding this immigration and citizenship process.[24][25]

Esmaeil Ahmadi-Moghaddam, Iran's chief of police, told reporters that Monis had "a dark and long history of violent crime and fraud" in Iran and had run a travel agency in 1996, before fleeing to Malaysia and then Australia. "It lasted 4 years to collect evidence on Manteghi [Monis]'s identification documents and we reported this to the Australian police but since Australia has no extradition treaty with Iran, they didn't extradite him to Iran".[22] He was protected from extradition by his refugee status.[26]

Iran's official Islamic Republic News Agency states that he was "under prosecution by the Interpol" and Iran provided information to the Australian government about his criminal record, mental and spiritual status. Despite this, he was granted asylum in Australia.[23] Iranian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Marzieh Afkham publicly questioned the decisions made by the Australian government after several discussions in which Monis's criminal status in Iran was made "completely clear".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M...
 

 

Now for the cover-up. Australians are entitled to know, but are highly unlikely to be told, who were the lawyers and officials who advocated that Man Haron Monis be allowed to live in Australia, and then granted citizenship, despite red flag after red flag that he was trouble.

Magistrates, lawyers and police prosecutors collectively decided that Monis, with a long history of harassing behaviour, with links to the brutal murder of his former wife, with charges for sexual assaults of multiple women, with a history of extreme political views, with convictions for writing threatening letters, and with an open record of support for jihad, was deemed no threat to society.

Right at the start, in 1996, when Monis claimed political asylum, the Iranian authorities made it clear that he had been charged with multiple counts of theft that had nothing to do with either political persecution or capital crimes. The Iranian foreign ministry reiterated this week that his psychological instability and criminal charges were known to Australian officials when they granted him asylum status.

Within months, Monis had chained himself to the front gate of state Parliament in Macquarie Street in a political protest. He was later given citizenship.

http://www.canberratimes.com.a...
 

1 2 >

Najčítanejšie na SME Kultúra